-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
The Bottom Is Dropping Out of the Obama Presidency | USNews.com | 10.29.12
Last week, we may have seen the bottom beginning to drop out of the Obama presidency.
Even the MSMosphere is starting to feel the good Mitt Romney (or maybe it’s bad Barack Obama) vibrations. Last Friday, ABC News’s Terry Moran tweeted, “Obama’s campaign seems small-bore, predominantly negative, and downright weird (Lena Dunham)—a candidate off-stride in the closing days.”
I’ll say.
Let me see: Around the world al Qaeda is resurgent in the Middle East. Russia is treating us with menacing contempt. Murderous Mexican drug war mayhem is spilling into the United States. Meanwhile unemployment, underemployment, and poverty are on a trajectory that would have the networks and the New York Timescalling for removal of the president from office if the president weren’t Obama. And the economy is growing at…well growth is not a word that in any real sense you can apply to the American economy.
So in the midst of these multiple crises, what does the president’s crack re-election team come up with as a big theme? A defining television spot that launches the last days of the campaign and points the way to a brighter future?
Do they put out an economic revival policy that offers anything other than more spending here, more spending there, more spending, more spending everywhere? No. Not on your life. Forget about that.
Oh, wait, that’s right, he’s going to take the Navy from the current 287 ships to fewer than 230—when the Defense Department’s every-four-year strategic review found that essential American interests cannot be defended without 346. And that’s just one branch of our armed services.
And he’s going to tax the rich, when, according to Treasury Department figures, you could tax 100 percent of the income of those making $250,000 a year all the way up to Warren Buffet and Bill Gates and you’d come up with $2.5 trillion. Lunch money compared to the national debt of $16 trillion, unfunded liabilities (another form of debt) of $47 trillion, and an annual deficit of $1 trillion.
In other words, the president has nothing serious to say about the economy, the nation’s finances, or national security.
All his campaign can produce is that Lena Dunham business—a young woman advising other young women that first time voting is no different than first time sex with a really great guy. Now don’t misconstrue what I am about to say, but that ad was on a par with the one about Big Bird. What are these people thinking? I am all for humor in politics, but their stuff is not funny. Just juvenile. Does Team Obama know the difference?
We are facing one national crisis after another. Is this the best the president and his campaign can do? If not, they don’t deserve another term, if only for reasons of insulting all of our intelligence and grossing us out.
I said the bottom may have started to drop out for them. Not for sure. But it could be starting. Look at the Real Clear Politics sample of polls. For nearly a full week the Rasmussen and Gallup trackers have put Romney up with 50 percent of the vote. Every day. These are the two largest samples in the Real Clear Politics lineup. The next tier down in numbers surveyed comprises ABC News/Washington Post, Politico/GWU/Battleground and Monmouth/SurveyUSA/Braun. The first two have Romney at 49 percent, the third at 48 percent with a three point lead over the president.
Still there’s Ohio. In a panel at the American Enterprise Institute, political analyst Henry Olson speculated that Romney would not be able to bring blue-collar whites without college degrees over to him and would lose the Buckeye State.
You can hear that view all over Washington and its corollary: Whoever wins Ohio wins the presidency. There has been serious speculation around Washington the last few days that Romney will win the popular vote and not the Electoral College, giving the president a second term.
Hold on a minute. We have seen a wave develop in public opinion. Why would we believe it stops now? Doesn’t the bizarreness of the president’s campaign tell us what he and his managers believe—that things are going south for them and they have no plausible ideas for stopping the collapse?
Also, Team Obama is surely looking at the same polls that I am. It is inching close to a certainty that Romney has an alternative to winning Ohio. With Colorado and Missouri moving his way, Wisconsin should put him over, too.
Yup, the bottom may be dropping out for the Obama presidency. Stay tuned.