-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
The GOP Race Turns Upside Down Again | HughHewitt.com | 01.17.12
In this up and down year, last night’s South Carolina GOP debate turned the political world upside down again.
Going into the debate, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney had every reason to believe that he was within days of locking up the nomination. He had won (if just barely) the Iowa caucuses and more convincingly the New Hampshire primary. A win in South Carolina this coming Saturday would help cement his lead in Florida, the next state to vote. Running the early-state table would almost certainly result in a collapse of the other major campaigns. The game would be over just as it began.
Now it is not such a sure bet. For one thing, as early as today Iowa will certify its final tally. You’ve no doubt heard the rumors by now that, as of Monday afternoon, Santorum had pulled ahead of Mitt. No one is ready to say the lead won’t shift again as the last counties report, and whatever the outcome, the margin will surely remain a sliver. But at this hour (shortly after midnight) there is a reasonable chance that Santorum will pick up Iowa bragging rights, and Romney will not be able to claim a historic win in the first two states.
After last night, South Carolina can be considered up for grabs, too. It is not that Romney had a poor debate. I thought he was splendid, his best performance yet, and not by accident. Beginning a couple of debates ago, he started to articulate a genuine vision of the nation and its future, a major advance in how he presented himself and his case. His election night victory speech in New Hampshire built on this new sense of compass and left me, at least feeling confident he would be a highly effective standard bearer in the fall.
Add on top of that the damage that former House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s assaults on Romney have been doing to Gingrich himself. Throughout the week in which the Gingrich camp’s ads against Bain Capital (the private equity firm Romney founded) were running, Republicans of all persuasions had been recoiling. Whether they can find the words for it or not, nearly all Republicans understand the distinction between profit and rents. Profit is when you run a business that brings in more than it spends, and does this by careful management and giving customers what they need and want. Rents are when you make your money by getting government to rig the game.
The anger at Wall Street (at least in conservative circles) in the wake of the financial crisis comes from a widespread belief that the profits the great financial houses claimed in recent years were really rents, the result of a government manipulated game that, as the saying went, socialized losses and privatized gains. We can debate the justice of the indictment, but no one believes Mitt Romney played in markets where the cards were stacked in his favor. And last night he was, I thought, entirely convincing going through the investments Bain Capital had made, showing, for example, that under his management the firm had invested in a number of steel mills, at least one of which they turned into a success.
You know that in most of the Republican Party, the governor’s readiness to take financial risk to revive a basic American manufacturing industry is seen as a plus. Gingrich’s attacks put the former speaker on the wrong side of that discussion and, as Bush 43 chief White House speechwriter Marc Thiessen wrote in the Washington Post yesterday (see http://tiny.cc/848wj), were rapidly sinking Gingrich’s candidacy.
But that was before last night.
What can you say when a debater brings the audience in the hall to its feet cheering? Again and again, you felt that Gingrich had got to the heart of an issue, seized the initiative, and driven home a point in a way that spoke of knowledge, originality, a clear sense of enduring values and passion.
Everywhere you turn, you hear Republicans weighing which candidate will be best able defeat the president in the general election debates. With Mr. Obama having a billion dollars at his command (and his Super Pacs almost surely deploying another billion), face-to-face matches may not play as big a role in the fall campaign as they are now. Still, almost weekly rehearsal has made this entire field so strong in debate (and, yes, by now this includes Texas governor Rick Perry) that any one of them is likely to be strong against the president.
And yet, last night Gingrich stood out – way out. If he closes the gap between him and Governor Romney by Saturday, a big share of the credit will go to two hours on a stage in Myrtle Beach on Monday night.