-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
For the Mid-Terms, Does the GOP Have What it Takes?| Hugh Hewitt |09.29.14
By all rights, the GOP should be walking away with the mid-term elections, a shoo-in to capture the Senate and even make gains in the House, which they already hold by a comfortable margin.
After all, the job environment remains dismal. According to the union-backed Economic Policy Institute, if you are a recent college grad, your chances of being unemployed or underemployed are 25 percent. If you are a recent high school grad not going to college, those odds rise to 63 percen
It is not much better for women and minorities. The number of women and minorities employed in the United States is all but unchanged since the Democrats took over the government in 2009. The incomes of both have dropped.
These groups have strongly favored Mr. Obama, but the last six years have been a disaster for them. Normally, it would be a fair bet that many of them would elect to stay home.
Then, too, with daily headlines focused on Vladimir Putin’s adventurism and ISIS’s latest atrocities – and with a border with Mexico that the Democrats have fought to keep effectively open now understood to be a terrorist sieve — this is shaping up to be a national security election. The question of the year is, “Are you safer now than you were six years ago?” That’s a bad question for any Democratic candidate
But before getting too giddy, remember, the Democrats have a secret weapon. Remember all those fundraisers the president has attended? And those golf games where surely his cart mates were forking over major bucks for a round on the links with the big guy? Team Obama may not know how to run the government, revive the economy or keep the country out of harms way. But they sure know how to raise and spend campaign money.
Their spending is as sophisticated as their raising. Here is a sign of what they are doing and how they are doing it.
Since 2010, the Wesleyan Media Project (http://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/, at Wesleyan University in Middletown, Connecticut) has been buying comprehensive, real time, market-by-market television and cable advertising data on all president, governor, Senate, and House races around the nation. The project sifts the information by character of the ads and other factors.
This year one word is coming through from the project’s reports: swamped. Advertising on behalf of Democratic candidates is swamping what is being done for Republicans.
For all Senate races, from late August to mid September, the number of pro-Democrat ad airings totaled 34,000, compared to 29,000 for Republicans, meaning that for every five ads the Republicans run, the Democrats put up just short of six. In House races the margin was almost two airings to one, 20,554-10,855.
According to the Wesleyan project’s analysis, Democrat Senate campaigns have been significantly outspending Republicans in the toss-up states (per Real Clear Politics) of Louisiana, Georgia, North Carolina, Michigan and Iowa. They are also overwhelming the GOP in safe (for them) Washington State, Minnesota, New Mexico and Virginia. And their tone is harsher. In Senate races, Wesleyan reports, “Democrats [are] far more likely to air pure attack ads (42 percent) and Republicans [to air] more contrast spots (42 percent).”
The Democrat’s tsunami will only build. None of this data takes into account online ad buys and social media, where the Democrats are thought to have a significant advantaged over the GOP. Then, too, campaigns typically reserve half their ad budgets for the last two weeks before Election Day, although with pre-Election Day voting already underway in some places, that pattern may be diminishing.
With all this, it is no wonder that the mathematical modelers are basically calling the GOP chances of taking over the Senate (http://wapo.st/1rvu0Bl) close to even, or perhaps a little below even.
The lesson here is not gloom and doom. It is just what Yogi Berra said of baseball: “It isn’t over ‘til it’s over.” Berra was a champion. Champions have the grit to come from behind. In 2014, will the GOP?