-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Postmortem: The Budget Battle on the Morning After | HughHewitt.com | 10.17.13
“Obama Wins.” That’s the lead morning headline at Politico.com and the unanimous view in this city about the outcome of the government shutdown and debt ceiling standoff of the last few weeks.
In policy, we have the status quo ante: The government is funded at sequester levels; the debt ceiling has been suspended so the government can meet its borrowing needs over the next four months. The only change in Obamacare is a strengthening of safeguards against fraud among recipients.
In politics, everyone suffered in the polls. Republicans suffered more.
Here are four thoughts for Republicans coming out of the battle, looking behind and looking ahead.
Debt Ceiling: The White House took a “no negotiation” stance in this round. No negotiating on the debt ceiling in particular. It was a good place for them to dig in. Refusing to raise the debt ceiling was the GOP’s weakest card.
The credit worthiness of the United States was established under Alexander Hamilton and has been one of the country’s greatest strengths ever since. It has allowed us to fund our national defense at a level unmatched by any nation. The security and volume of federal obligations has provided a foundation for our financial markets.
By focusing on the debt ceiling, the GOP allowed the president whose spending has been in large measure responsible for the first ever downgrading of the U.S. government’s credit rating to pose as the preserver of this irreplaceable national resource.
Last week an eminent Republican, not now in government, whose opinion I respect took me aside to mildly chastise me. He took exception with my columns supporting the House Republicans and their allies in the Senate on this issue. “I cannot believe,” he said, “that we [the nation] are having this discussion about the debt ceiling. Do we know what we are playing with?” In response, I pointed out that I had recently written that Republicans should vote to raise the debt ceiling.
Still he had a point. The debt ceiling is a dangerous place to take a stand, dangerous enough that many who are natural and perhaps essential allies of the congressional Republicans on cutting spending and ultimately repealing Obamacare will not go there. Looking forward, Republicans should remember that focusing on it weakens the GOP hand rather than strengthening it.
Structure of the Game: The government funding battle was framed around the continuing resolution. A CR is a single bill. Between one set of covers and through one vote of Congress, it funds the entire federal establishment. So when an impasse comes, the operations of the full government are brought to a halt.
Wouldn’t it make more sense to have a separate continuing resolution for each of the 12 appropriations bills that in normal times Congress would pass to fund the government? This is especially true if the battle plan is to focus on Obamacare or any other particular area of spending. Get everything else off the table. Frame the issue on the specific areas where you want it framed.
Communications: Yes, the House and Senate Republican leadership should have paid more attention to making their case on conservative talk radio, to marshal the conservative base. But the communications problems for the GOP these last few weeks were much broader. Partly, perhaps, because of internal party divisions, for long periods communications seemed to be limited to floor speeches in the Senate and House and a few national television and radio interviews members of Congress gave.
Communications must go much deeper than that. There should be teams working all the various organs of media including online not just nationally but regionally, with special attention to swing states and congressional districts with Democratic senators and representatives. The president’s no-negotiation strategy worked because support from his own party in Congress remained unbroken. The GOP message strategy and the message delivery should be devised to crack the Democrats’ wall and break through it.
The Issue That Cannot Go Away: These last few weeks saw just the most recent round in a continuing battle that started decades ago. The struggle between limited and unlimited government forces in America arguably began with FDR but took on an entirely new dimension under LBJ. Conservatives regularly charge Richard Nixon with being too liberal. But Nixon’s strenuous attempt to cut government spending was a major – perhaps THE major — behind-the-scenes factor driving Democrats to seek his impeachment. Ronald Reagan fought the battle for spending control far more successfully than any GOP president or congress of the big spending era before or since. The Gingrich House and Dole Senate fought it well, too, and, with the cut in the capital gains tax rate they passed over Clinton Administration resistance, were responsible for the budget surpluses of that period.
The fight will continue if only because the levels of on-the-books and off-the-books debt the nation has assumed during the Obama presidency, and now projected, will crush the economy and the government as we know it – and with it our freedom, prosperity and security. Enough of the American people understand this alarming fact that the issue cannot go away.