-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Who’s Right, Gallup or Rasmussen? Today may tell. | Ricochet.com | 10.19.12
By now it is clear that, in terms of public perceptions (maybe on points, too), all three debates have been winners for Romney-Ryan. But have they been big enough winners to push the GOP ticket over the top?
In Washington, the question is being framed this way: Is Romney up 49-47 points, as pollster Scott Rasmussen’s three day tracking poll shows, or is he up 52-45 points, per Gallup’s seven-day tracker.
Walter Mondale’s ’84 campaign manager Bob Beckel said yesterday on Fox that if Gallup is right, the race is over. In other words, if Gallup is right, the swing state by swing state polling that is the current obsession can be dismissed as beside the point. It is inconceivable that a seven point national popular vote margin would produce anything other than an Electoral College win.
That’s why, here in DC, the political and journalistic worlds are waiting anxiously for today’s Gallup numbers. Gallup’s first daily report with a big spread (on Tuesday) could have been a fluke. The second day’s (which is where we are as I write) looked more plausible, particularly as Romney’s number moved up a point, suggesting that he had polled extraordinarily strongly two nights in a row. So if Gallup’s numbers hold up today, you can expect the weekend buzz to be that the Obama reelection prospects could be collapsing, a prospect I speculated on in an earlier post.
Is it really possible that the debates had such a one-sided impact? Yes, thanks to a major strategic miscalculation of Team Obama, one that a senior Democrat highlighted at the beginning of the week. Monday night on BBC radio, I was paired with Clinton’s 1992 campaign manager Mickey Kantor. Asked what the president had to do in the next evening’s debate, Kantor did not lead with pummeling Romney, the flavor of the day in Democratic circles and exactly what Mr. Obama made Job 1 the next night. Instead Kantor started out saying Obama needed to articulate an agenda for the next four years, advice which, if he heard, the president ignored.
Instead of promoting an agenda, the president’s campaign has been built around what they call “disqualifying” Mitt Romney. We’ve all seen the ads and heard the charges. But here’s the mistake. If you 1) offer no plan for the future, 2) put something like $100 million in advertising behind portraying your opponent as a monster and 3) that story doesn’t stand up when you and he meet with 60-70 million people watching, you have discredited yourself and have nothing to fall back on.
That’s where the race may be today. When the tracking polls are updated sometime this morning, we will have a better feel for what the state of play actually is.