-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Advice to Romney: Go Big, All In | HughHewitt.com | 10.01.12
In GOP circles, the call continues to build for Governor Romney to deliver major addresses on the economy and foreign policy.
In last week’s column, I noted that, in addition to my column the week before, this sentiment was being expressed among Republicans and conservatives around the nation. I mentioned hearing it from another former Reagan White House speechwriter now in a prominent California think tank, a leading U.S. senator and reportedly a former GOP White House spokesperson.
Then, midweek this past week, celebrated commentator Charles Krauthammer said the same thing in his column, that Mr. Romney needed to stop playing it safe. “When you’re behind,” Krauthammer wrote, “safe is fatal.”
Krauthammer singled out the foreign policy speech Mr. Romney delivered to the Clinton Global Initiative meeting last week, touting foreign aid reform. Of foreign aid, Krauthammer said, “A worthy topic to a chin pulling joint luncheon of the League of Women Voters and the Council on Foreign Relations. But as the core of a challenger’s major foreign policy address amid a Lehman-like collapse of the Obama Doctrine?”
Next, yesterday on ABC’s “This Week,” former Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour jumped in, accompanied by former George W. Bush strategist Matthew Dowd. The GOP nominee needs to be talking about big issues, Governor Barbour explained — the disastrous course of our foreign policy, the stagnate state of our economy, that neither needed to be in such catastrophic condition, whatever the state of things when Mr. Obama took office. The big issues are Mr. Romney’s strength, Barbour continued. He must focus on them if he is to win.
The fact is that all year the president’s team has been playing a game of “squirrel” with the media. You remember the Pixar movie Up. In a lost land, the boy hero and the crotchety geezer to whom he has attached himself encounter talking, airplane-flying dogs. The dogs look really dangerous, until someone, anyone, points and shouts, “Squirrel,” sending these ADD creatures racing towards the point, in whatever direction it may have been. Mr. Obama has been playing squirrel with the media, very successfully, all year.
First it was a string of bogus “wars.” In the telling of the president and his campaign, Mr. Romney harbored such animus against every conceivable sector of the American voters – if you were living and breathing, the Obama campaign found a war Romney wanted to wage on you — that the former governor had spent years of his life and untold amounts of his money to get himself in a position to sound the battle call. Absurd? Yes. But the media ran with it for months.
At the Republican convention, it was “Ryan’s lies.” As it turned out, every word Ryan spoke was true. That didn’t keep the media dogs from barking after the twittered squirrel even before the vice presidential nominee finished speaking.
Governor Barbour’s point yesterday was that Mr. Romney cannot beat such tactics with small issues. He can’t, for example, pick a running mate known for his plans to pull Medicare and Social Security out of their death spirals and then decline to talk about Medicare and Social Security. He must start addressing the big issues of our day.
This week’s Denver debate will be a good place to start.
The debate is on economic and fiscal issues. It has been said that, with high unemployment and low labor force participation rates and all-but-non-existent GDP growth, the last two years (2011-2012) may turn out to be the worst non-recession, non-depression years in U.S. history. Some add that with real disposable personal income below last year, the recovery is hard to distinguish from the downturn.
Meanwhile, the president’s only prescription is borrow more and tax the rich. He implies that the rich are a bottomless well of untapped cash, whereas if we tax all the money all of them have, we will get $2.5 trillion, once. Our debt is $16 trillion and the president is adding $1 trillion to it every year. In any event, in an economy that depends for growth and job generation on new business creation (100 percent of the net new jobs over the last three decades have come from businesses that were five years old or less), higher taxes and spending are exactly the wrong way to go. Calling for such policies, as Mr. Obama has done, is another way of crying “squirrel.”
So Governor Romney needs to talk about big issues – and he needs to do it in big forums. Places where all the nation can hear. Places that by-pass the ADD media and reach the voters directly. The debates, yes. Also, I believe, a national television buy, ideally across networks and news channels, not just to capture all viewers, but to announce that he is making a big play.
All in.