-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Truth in Tampa; Hysteria in Charlotte | HughHewitt.com | 09.03.12
How do you know that the GOP convention was a big success? Just look at the near hysteria of the Paul-Ryan-lied stories coming out of the Obama campaign. Obama manager David Axelrod and his minions want to make America forget that Mr. Ryan spoke the truth in his acceptance speech on Wednesday night, as Governor Romney did in his on Thursday.
The emptiness of the accusations against Mr. Ryan tells a lot about how the campaign is shaping up and the stakes behind it.
Exhibit one for the critics is that Ryan’s speech mischaracterized the history of the Janesville, Wisconsin, GM assembly plant.
The charge is that the plant closing had nothing to do with President Obama. It happened, we’re told, while George W. Bush was still president – except, as it turns out, it didn’t. GM announced the plant would close in mid-2008. Production continued until April 2009, three months into the Obama administration. In October 2008, Candidate Obama had promised to keep that specific facility running, if he were elected. Yet despite billions in his GM bailout, once in office he lifted not a finger to guarantee that GM Janesville stayed in production. Today the plant remains empty but on standby, pending a revival in the auto market, which depends on a revival in the economy.
But Ryan voted against the GM bailout, the Democrats’ campaign responds. Right, and Ryan’s point in his speech was that despite such misguided policies as the bailout, the GM plant was still shut down. A focus on restarting the general economy, not refinancing particular companies, would have been the right approach to saving the jobs of Janesville’s autoworkers – and so many millions of other jobs nationwide.
The text of Mr. Ryan’s address (http://tinyurl.com/d2gsakx) clearly laid out this history and critique, compressing it to fit the constraints of a speech. Writers at sites like National Review Online (http://tinyurl.com/d44m833), Forbes (http://tinyurl.com/8o2o2aj) and the Washington Examiner (http://tinyurl.com/c9wehzj) understood Mr. Ryan and determined the emptiness of the Obama campaign’s charges against him quickly. So how is it that reporters and columnists at the New York Times, the Washington Post and ABC News still cling so uncritically to the Ryan-lied line?
That’s a rhetorical question. Like David Axelrod and his band, the MSMosphere, too, gives every sign of fearing that the Tampa convention turned the corner for the Romney-Ryan candidacy.
The attacks didn’t stop with the Ryan address. The Obama campaign ranted that the entire GOP convention was built on lies, in particular about the president’s now famous “you didn’t build that” diatribe. Mr. Obama was talking about roads, schools and other public services, they tell us. All he spoke was the truism that if you build a business, you depend on all of those public works and services for your success.
But it is also a truism that a team of young people starting a company depends on the cars they drive, the workspace they rent, the telephone service at the workplace, the Fed Ex service, the office and equipment suppliers and a vast network of support, almost all of which is privately produced. In saying that business builders didn’t build “that” was the president referring not just to the contribution of the government but to those of Ford and Fed Ex and Apple and millions of other private companies that every firm depends on directly or indirectly? After all, every one of these – private as well as public — is part of our “wonderful American system,” to use his apt phrase.
But the chilling assumption behind the president’s rant was very different than the assumption that underpins our system. Our system assumes that we the people created the government, hired the staff in it and gave them specific jobs to do, paying them through taxes that we ourselves assessed. The government did not build us and does not in some measure own us, as Mr. Obama so clearly supposes.
As Clint Eastwood put it, “We own this country…. Politicians are employees of ours…. And when somebody does not do the job, we got to let them go.”
One devastating statement came out of Tampa. The Democrats in Charlotte may ignore it, but they cannot have a successful convention unless they effectively respond to it. It was Governor Romney’s statement: “[T]his president cannot tell us that YOU are better off today than when he took office.”
This week we will see what, if anything, the Charlotte convention has to say in reply.