-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Right Time Right Man: GOP Mood in Tampa | HughHewitt.com | 08.28.12
As Republicans prepare in Tampa for their convention to at last get underway, the mood of the party is vastly different from four years ago.
On the day John McCain delivered his acceptance speech to the St. Paul convention, I wrote in the Wall Street Journal that the GOP was “a party that doubts itself.” There were many causes for lack of self-confidence. But none was so corrosive as the failure of spending restraint in Republican congresses and the Bush Administration from 2001 to 2006.
Social conservatives felt with good reason that the Bush Administration had gone to bat for the issues they cared about. From the top down, the administration was sincerely committed to what is sometimes termed the family agenda and was effective at pursuing it.
National security conservatives were generally on board with Mr. Bush’s prosecution of the War on Terror, particularly after the late 2006 announcement of the surge in Iraq ended a period of corrosive passivity.
But federal spending and the size and scope of government were different matters. The late Clinton years’ budget surpluses and declining federal debt had created new expectations about the fiscal management of the government. New standards made even less tolerable the jump up in domestic spending, not to mention the failure after much fanfare to address the erosion of Social Security’s solvency. The financial crisis was still to come, but once secure elements of the GOP’s base were already drifting away when the party met in Minnesota.
The Obama Team effectively played on that disillusionment in the fall, and of course there was the Democrat’s calm, focused bearing when the housing bubble burst compared to Senator McCain’s overwrought response. But even in August, those who had once trusted the GOP on economics and restraint of government were in doubt and drift.
Things are very different in Tampa today.
A lot of it has to do with the performance of the Obama administration. Over the last three and a half years, trillion-dollar bailouts, stimulus programs, deficits and debt increases have tumbled out of the White House one after another. The president has assured us that this unprecedented spending was the price of recovery. But if so, the country feels cheated. For when the merchandise was delivered and the box opened, no recovery was inside. The proportion of adult Americans with jobs today is lower than the day the president took office.
So along comes Mitt Romney.
In American history, no nominee of either party has ever had a better claim on knowing first hand how job creation works in America or on mastery of the management skills needed to fix the government’s spending and unfunded entitlement crises. He brings the right experience and abilities to the national table at the right time.
Pundits have been telling us that the former Massachusetts governor should downplay the Paul Ryanesque emphasis on the controlling budget in favor of more talk about jobs and growth.
But as a Rasmussen poll (http://tinyurl.com/cqa62f2 ) released last week found, a solid plurality of likely voters (48%) feels cuts in federal spending help the economy compared to only about half as many (25%) who feel they hurt. The same poll found that 53% view tax cuts as good for the economy compared to only 16% who say they hurt.
In other words, not only on the president’s record, but on what to do to fix the economy, Governor Romney is perfectly placed for reclaiming the GOP mantle as the place to fix, in Mr. Obama’s phrase, “this mess we’re in.”
I met last week with a senior conservative strategist, one of the shrewdest men in Washington. We talked about the Democrats’ Mediscare tactics. He reflected that the Obama team has made a major mistake in going after Romney and Ryan as they have. “The elderly today aren’t the same people as twenty years ago,” he noted. It was Eisenhower, the 70’s stagflation, Carter’s ineptness and the Reagan recovery that shaped them, not the New Deal. Their fear is not that Medicare and Social Security won’t be there for them. They fear for their children – and they want the programs fixed, now.
The Administration is making exactly the same mistake with its frenzied attacks on Mr. Romney’s wealth and his supposedly heartless focus on spending. This isn’t the 1930s, or even the ‘50s. Americans have different economic views and priorities today – and Mitt Romney fits those expectations very well.
So as it convenes in Tampa, the Republican Party is feeling a confidence and energy that were missing in 2008 in Minnesota.
Let the campaign begin.