-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
How the GOP Will Win… or Lose | HughHewitt.com | 02.28.12
As two more states hold Republican primaries today, the message out of national data is that the election is the GOP’s to lose – and the party may prove fully up to the task.
Yes, I have heard talk about the president’s approval ratings surging. But look at the Rasmussen tracking graph (http://tinyurl.com/5tnd2b). If the president’s approval rating were a stock, no one would claim we are coming out of the recession. Rather, Obama, Inc. fell from amazing heights right after its 2008 IPO to depressed levels within a year, established a trading range and has stayed within that range ever since. The top of the range is about 50 percent, the bottom about forty. The stock has become a little more volatile over the last seven months. It has moved from the top to the bottom to the top. Not much time has been spent in the middle. But it has never escaped the range.
We have all heard about the Rasmussen polls of the last week showing both Mitt Romney and Ron Paul beating the president and Rick Santorum only a few points behind. In truth, all three spreads are within the margin of error. But after all the beatings they have given one another, for the three major GOP contenders to be tied with the president at this stage of the game suggests deep, underlying strength.
Here is one arresting statistic. It comes from political commentator Michael Barone. He may have written about it, probably has, but I heard him say it at a dinner last night, so I can’t give you the link. Take the last five elections. Compare the popular vote in each to the popular vote by party for the House of Representatives in the prior mid-term election. In each case, Barone said, the Democrat v. Republican presidential outcome is within one percentage point of the national Democrat v. Republican midterm vote.
As I say, evidence is accumulating that the race is the GOP’s to lose. But can it win?
Yesterday House whip Kevin McCarthy addressed the annual Washington meeting of the Hoover Institution. McCarthy was in charge of the GOP 2010 effort to take back the House. He talked in part about the statistical analysis he and his staff had performed to establish goals for the race and about the kinds of candidates he had recruited. One was Stephen Fincher, now a first-term congressman. When McCarthy met him, Fincher was, as The Almanac of American Politics describes him, “a gospel-singing farmer” who “grew up in Frog Jump, Tennessee.” What did McCarthy like about Mr. Fincher? He had never run for public office. Running would be a financial hardship. But he was determined to do it, because he was so alarmed at the direction the country was taking.
McCarthy’s point was that the Republicans won’t win on any level unless candidates show the same kind of commitment and passion Fincher showed, not for polls and consultants, but for rescuing the nation. We will win on what we stand for, he said. We have got to tell people how we will cut spending, balance the budget, bring down the debt, and revive economic growth.
Alarm about the financial future of the nation permeates all serious quarters in Washington these days – a qualification that apparently leaves out the White House. But does it also leave out the GOP contenders?
Over the past week, I have spoken with a number of political insiders you would assume are friends and supporters of Senator Santorum’s candidacy. All… all… have expressed dismay about the cul d’sac into which he has driven his candidacy — references to the president’s “theology” and other such remarks. “You would never advise him [Santorum] to use that word,” one sighed. That’s all the press will talk about now, he added, continuing, we’ve got off the major issues.
In a recent gathering of policy experts, one particularly shrewd observer from overseas echoed this concern about the nation’s focus. America’s debt, he said, is a threat to global security. His point was that the United States is the anchor of global peace and freedom. If we spend ourselves into the status of Greece, the entire world will suffer, catastrophically.
As we enter our fourth year of trillion dollar deficits with the administration promising only more of the same, GOP voters should insist that the candidates for the nomination start to talk about what must be done to rescue the nation and the world? Against the billions that the president and his George Soros-type friends will pour into the coming race, we can’t win unless we do.