-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
GOP New Year’s Blues | HughHewitt.com | December 27, 2011
With the Iowa caucuses a week away, uneasiness pervades GOP circles in Washington and around the country.
Part of the reason – but only part – stems from continuing disquiet about the field of candidates.
“Mitt or Newt,” I was asked at a holiday party of longtime conservatives and activists last night. No matter how I replied everyone groaned. It turned out that in the minds of this group of political veterans there was no right answer.
Anxiety about whether former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has the temperament for the job – including whether he has the organizational skill to run a national scale political organization – wasn’t helped by the Christmas Eve announcement that he had missed Virginia’s primary filing deadline. Meanwhile, comments that former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney has failed to articulate a story – a narrative of the nation’s past and present and the choices and prospects for its future – brought vigorous nods.
How about the rest of the field? None figured as serious contenders in the minds of these pros. Ron Paul was dismissed as the next Huckabee, possible winner of Iowa but nothing else. Santorum? “Looks beaten,” one said. Huntsman, Bachmann, and Perry were all judged deservedly out of the running.
Last night’s gathering was of Washington insiders, but the attitudes and anxieties were the same I have been hearing around the nation. No one feels settled about the field. There were even press reports last week of major donors exploring whether it was too late for a new candidate to jump in.
But more than a lack of confidence in the choices explains these holiday blues. There is also the math of getting from here (national crisis under this president) to there (a GOP president ready to mount a rescue).
Here are some sobering electoral numbers.
In our five presidential elections beginning with Bill Clinton’s 1992 defeat of George H.W. Bush, the Democrats have won eighteen states and the District of Columbia every time. That is 242 electoral votes of 270 needed to win. The GOP starts with only 176 secure electoral-college ballots in 21 states. The decision will turn on the remaining eleven states: Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Iowa, Missouri, New Hampshire, Ohio, Florida, Virginia, and West Virginia. It is a gift to the GOP to call Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada toss ups. They have very strong Democratic tendencies. And last week, a widely noted poll came out showing that attitudes of Virginia voters towards the president are much more favorable than anyone guessed. Win those four states – Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada and Virginia — and Mr. Obama snags a second term.
If that doesn’t dampen your holiday cheer, consider this tidbit. You may have heard it. There is a good chance the primaries will not produce a candidate.
Throughout the primary-dominated period in presidential nominating that began in the late 1960s, national political conventions have been largely media affairs. Expertly staged for television, each party’s once-in-four-years meetings have become marathon infomercials. They just sell candidates and platforms rather than Cuisinarts, costume jewelry, and knives.
But don’t count on this being the case at the GOP’s Tampa convocation in August. For unlike years past, many state delegations will not be selected on a winner-take-all basis. The reason? Last year the party adopted the following rule: “Any presidential primary, caucus, convention, or other meeting held for the purpose of selecting delegates to the national convention… shall provide for the allocation of delegates on a proportional basis.”
The mechanics of how the apportionment will work remain a bit fuzzy, as is the exact list of states the may be exempted from the rule. I am guessing that state parties retain a say in the manner by which the resolution is put into effect (congressional district take all, for example, versus proportion of votes cast statewide). And states that hold their primaries after April 1st apparently may opt for winner take all. But whatever the details, here is the underlying fact: with two candidates (Gingrich and Romney) appearing to each have a secure thirty percent of GOP voters behind them and the rest of the field splitting the remaining third (all of whom are sticking with their candidates, at least for the moment), it is easy to envision a similar division among the delegates in Tampa.
In other words, forget about the informercial. We’re talking a WWF-style smackdown and who knows how that might play with the public.
Happy New Year.