-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
What Happened? A pre-election post-election look at tomorrow’s voting | HughHewitt.com | 11.01.10
Where do we stand today, on election eve?
Late yesterday, Gallup posted the following pre-election assessment: “Taking Gallup’s final survey’s margin of error into account, the historical model predicts that the Republicans could gain anywhere from 60 seats on up, with gains well beyond that possible.” That would mean 238 Republican votes in the House next year, at the very least.
As of this morning, Real Clear Politics’ “Battle for the Senate” analysis projects a 50-50 Democrat-Republican outcome in the upper chamber. Only a few days ago RCP had the Democrats at 52 seats in the new Senate. They still give the Democrats both West Virginia and California. But with the wind blowing so powerfully the GOP’s way, at least one and possibly both of those close races could go Republican, too.
It isn’t over ‘til it’s over. The unions will be launching massive get-out-the-vote efforts, and with federally mandated same-day registration, they will surely manufacture tens of thousands of votes. The trial lawyers are poised to pull a Franken all over the country, litigating every close vote count until the Democrat emerges a winner. And who knows in how many states the electronic voting machines have been manipulated, as appears to have been discovered in Nevada?
A five point-plus race is hard to steal. A blow out may not be counted as a blow out, but odds are high, it will be counted as a win. So the key to winning tomorrow is to win big, which looks likely.
Assuming a blow out, what happened? Two years ago, the mainstream media was reading the Republican Party’s obituary. What brought us here and where are we going?
Here are three facts to keep in mind in the weeks ahead:
Fact number one: Tuesday’s win will not have happened overnight. Since the late 1990s, what might be called the Great American Swing Vote has been looking for elected officials who would restrain spending, keep taxes low, and produce budget surpluses. This vote was part of the story of the 2000 election, when Al Gore walked away from the Clinton-GOP-Congress centrist legacy with his “People versus the Powerful” campaign, and the Great American Swing Vote turned to George W. Bush.
By 2005, pollsters were starting to find that a large group of GOP supporters from the prior two elections was becoming disaffected from the president and his Congress. After the 2006 defeat, Republican National Committee chairman Ken Mehlman was reported to have told his staff, “We got out our vote. They just voted for the other guys.” That disaffection built over the next two years, setting the stage for the Obama victory in 2008.
The new White House team could not have more thoroughly misread their election. Their trillion-dollar stimulus, bailouts, health overhaul, and projected deficits drove the Great American Swing Vote back to the GOP. The bad economy said to those voters that not only had all that money been spent but we got nothing for it.
Fact number two: This year’s vote will have been against the Democrats, not for the Republicans. After the cavalcade of trillions, the Great American Swing Vote fears the Obama-Reid-Pelosi Democrats. But they don’t trust the Republicans. They know that following each campaign, the voice of the Dark Side rises. Last July, in the political equivalent of Darth Vader’s “Luke, I am your father,” former-Senate-majority-leader now-lobbyist Trent Lott said, “We don’t need a lot of [Tea Party types]. As soon as they get here, we need to co-opt them.”
But if the new crop of Luke Skywalker’s heeds that corrupting call, the GOP could end up going the way of the Whigs. The Great American Swing Vote may be just one election from rejecting both parties.
Fact number three: Something more than traditionally defined self-interest is moving in our politics. Around the world – for example, in Britain, Germany, France, and nearly in Australia — voters have been backing governments that will cut spending and put their nations on a financially sustainable, pro-growth footing. They appear ready to take cuts in benefits to achieve this end, even to demand cuts. In the United States, voters are calling for something else, as well: restricting government’s power. Listening to the voices of 2010, you hear the fear that the terrifying run-up in spending doesn’t just undermine the government’s solvency. It challenges the Constitutional system and compromises the nation’s character.
In other words, the Great American Swing Vote cannot be bought with a bridge or an entitlement. It is the highest-minded phenomenon American politics has produced in decades. It is the determining force in American politics today, and when the new Congress convenes, it must be heard.