-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
A Political Transformation | HughHewitt.com | 10.25.10
It is the final week of the campaign, and as the two sides begin to make their closing arguments, CBS’ 60 Minutes dropped a bombshell last night.
For a segment on the economy, the television news magazine added to the official unemployment rate of 9.5 percent the number who had quit looking for work or had accepted part-time jobs because they couldn’t find full-time positions.
What is this true unemployment rate?
Seventeen percent, 22 percent in California, with one-third out of work more than a full year or more (video at http://tiny.cc/h2o6r ).
As the campaign reaches its climax, the president’s narrative is that this catastrophe is the product of what he calls “the policies that got us into this mess in the first place.” To him, that would be policies of lower tax rates and regulatory, spending, and monetary restraint. These are the policies that began with Ronald Reagan in 1981 and that inaugurated a quarter century of nearly uninterrupted economic growth, a record unmatched in American and perhaps world history.
We won’t know for sure until Election Day, but as of today, it looks as though the American people aren’t buying the president’s pass-the-buck story, or the special-interests-are-trying-to-buy-this-election story that accompanies it. Instead they see recent policies – the president’s policies — as the more plausible source of our continuing and possibly deepening troubles. To them, those misguided administration actions include trillions in bailouts for the irresponsible and the inept, additional terrifying trillions in federal spending and deficits, regulations that look like backdoor approaches to taking over entire industries, and the greatest tax increase in American history, scheduled to kick in a month and twenty-eight days after the voting.
A large part, perhaps a majority of the American people now clearly believes that, while the president and his Democratic allies in Congress inherited a sharp downturn, they have made it worse. The Obama-Pelosi-Reid government turned what could have been a short contraction into the deepest, most persistent economic crisis since the Great Depression.
In the process, these leaders have set us on course to the all-but-impossible: the effective bankrupting of the United States government. A recent chart running with a Wall Street Journal article by Hoover Institution economists including former Secretary of State George P. Shultz (see http://tiny.cc/6ssto) tells this story. It shows the government on track to annual spending as a percent of gross national product that exceeds the one-year World War II peak of 42 percent. Within twenty-five years, the government will be ingesting at least that much of our economy every single year. Within forty years, the proportion will rise to 55 percent.
So today many, perhaps most American voters would change the famous Ross Perot quip of 18 years ago. They would say that the giant sucking sound you hear is the U.S. government vacuuming up our future.
In recent weeks I have been trying to see how far and fast the developing electoral tide may advance. Every time I think I’ve found the outer limit, someone comes along and argues convincingly that it will go further. Now there is talk of a hundred House seats in play.
Democratic pollster Pat Caddell even argues that the polls are still dramatically understating the movement in opinion this year. The screens other pollsters employ to identify likely voters, he says, are totally inadequate to the turbulent moment. Large numbers who don’t often vote (and so would be routinely eliminated from samples) will show up.
Caddell also argues that the GOP needs to be running national ads making a national case. While I am inclined to agree, I also feel that this year’s tide is running on its own, and very little campaigning on either side will restrain or accelerate it or alter its course.
The Tea Party movement, for example, is not a product of campaign strategies. It is as spontaneous as any political outpouring in the nation’s history. Political leaders may give it a voice, but there is scant sign that they can direct it.
So the Republicans’ closing argument is being made on its own. In eight days we’ll see the results. But with unemployment at unfathomable levels and so much government spending having gone out with nothing to show in return, the dominant narrative of the year is coming, not from the president or his party or even from the Republican Party, but from the people – and it is about to transform American politics for the rest of our lives.