-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Ice in Their Veins Pros | HughHewitt.com | 10.04.10
The House of Representatives adjourned last week with all the style we have come to expect from the Obama-Pelosi-Reid congress. The normally all but unanimous shout of acclaim to go home turned into a one-vote-margin, roll-call squeaker in which Speaker Nancy Pelosi had to descend from the podium to cast the deciding ballot.
Messy? Yes. But the Democrat’s desperate but brilliant campaign strategy for October depended on winning that vote. How so?
Start with the state of electoral play. According to the latest RealClearPolitics.com tally, the Republicans are leading in eight Senate races with five in the balance. A ten-seat pick up takes control of the chamber.
On the House side, RCP rates the GOP solidly ahead in 207 seats versus 190 for the Democrats and 38 still in play.
In other words, the character of the next Congress, particularly the Senate, remains very much in play.
It doesn’t take a political savant – a Karl Rove or a James Carville – to see that the national upheaval against the Obama-Reid-Pelosi agenda is driven by revulsion over the unprecedented and potentially devastating spending of the last two years. That terrifying run-up in spending has been the determinative political fact of this election cycle.
A very large portion of Independents has come to see the combination of spending with tax increases on entrepreneurs and small business owners as devastating to America’s short-term economic recovery and long-term national viability. Anyone schooled in political campaigning knows that such strongly held views – which have remained steady in the polling for more than a year now – will not change before Election Day.
So the normal class warfare arguments and denunciations of any spending cut as ruining this or that sympathetic group have fallen flat — actually, worse than flat. The more Democratic candidates have harped on those long favored themes, the more their poll numbers have declined.
You have got to hand it to the Democratic leadership here in Washington. Yes, their strategy for reviving the economy was an exercise in economic fantasy. Actually, it is just a big payoff to their constituent groups and had little to do with economic revival. What more can you conclude when the president’s own retiring chair of the Council of Economic Advisors turns out to have published a major paper on how taxes of the kind the administration has championed hurt economic growth?
Nevertheless, even if they talk as though they live in an economic fantasyland, they remain in total touch with political reality. They know that, between now and November 2nd, every word, every vote, every news story, every reminder of any kind of their fiscal extravagance weighs on their prospects for holding the Senate and minimizing their losses in the House.
So the name of the campaign game has become change the subject. Through both paid and earned media, this past week saw an across-the-nation wave of personal assault on GOP candidates, particularly Senate candidates.
It was all very insubstantial stuff. You have probably heard every charge by now, but if not, this morning’s L.A. Times includes a good rundown (here http://tiny.cc/wgc37 ). As Jennifer Duffy of Cook’s Political Report told The Times, “If there’s a common thread, it’s that they’re all neophyte candidates, and novices tend to make mistakes…. They have trouble sticking to the stump speech, or they get a question and they over-answer it.”
But the Obama-Pelosi-Reid point – to a large extent missed in the commentary to date – is not to win on the Tea Party weirdness theme. Pundits have focused on the idea that the Democrats are raising doubts about GOP candidates wherever they can, which is true. But far more important, by directing the all-too-willing media in that direction, the Democratic pros have yanked the spotlight away from the fatal facts of Federal spending.
This brings us back to last week’s vote to adjourn. Two items remained on the Congressional docket: the budget and extending the Bush tax rates. For the first time in American history, the Congress adjourned without adopting a budget. Not even a continuing resolution came up for a vote, the normal stratagem when Congress is deadlocked on spending. What I am saying is that this was no accident.
Any budget vote would have put spending back on center stage. The same would have been true of any vote on tax rates. So Pelosi got her troops out of town without a vote on either.
The GOP neophytes are just learning the rules of political discipline. We saw this week that Washington’s Democratic leadership is made up of ice-in-their-veins pros.