-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Biden to the Rescue? | HughHewitt.com | 08.23.10
It is all too easy to become cynical about the mainstream media.
Last week Vice President Joe Biden uttered the now famous, “I’m going to get into trouble for saying this. This ain’t your father’s Republican Party. This is the Republican Tea Party.”
As it happened, this kindhearted warning to voters of the insidious transformation of the GOP was all but identical to a line of attack he took in 2008. At that time he said, “I don’t get it, really, all kidding aside. … This is not your father’s Republican party. These are people who talk about middle class tax cuts and the definition of what’s middle class – well, I guess below $4 million. Give me a break!” (http://tiny.cc/n2v41 )
The vice president didn’t like cuts to spending and taxes in 2008. He hasn’t liked them at anytime in his career. He doesn’t like them now. He is a centerpiece of the “political class” that pollster Scott Rasmussen talked about with the Wall Street Journal’s John Fund this past weekend (http://tiny.cc/0tbs1).
As Fund reported, “To figure out where people are [between what Rasmussen calls the Mainstream Public and the Political Class], [Rasmussen] asks three questions: Whose judgment do you trust more: that of the American people or America’s political leaders? Has the federal government become its own special interest group? Do government and big business often work together in ways that hurt consumers and investors? Those who identify with the government on two or more questions are defined as the political class.”
As to the size of these two groups, Rasmussen adds: “Before the financial crisis of late 2008, about a tenth of Americans fell into the political class, while some 53% were classified as in the mainstream public. The rest fell somewhere in the middle. Now the percentage of people identifying with the political class has clearly declined into single digits, while those in the mainstream public have grown slightly.”
Where does the Mainstream Public come down on Mr. Biden’s resistance to reductions in spending and taxing? As Fund reports:
“Mr. Rasmussen argues that Mr. Obama misread the data from early on in his administration. ‘People remember from his 2008 campaign that he promised to cut taxes for 95% of all Americans,’ he says. But Mr. Obama’s stimulus package only grudgingly included modest tax cuts as part of an effort to secure Republican votes in Congress. ‘The week it passed, our poll found 62% of voters wanted more tax cuts and less government spending in the stimulus,’ he says. ‘We shouldn’t be surprised people now think the stimulus has failed.’”
Nevertheless, despite being so out of touch with the general public, this week, for once, the vice president was rescuing the president, not the other way around.
After his fumbling insertion of himself into the Ground Zero mosque controversy, Mr. Obama spent the week walking back, as political consultants put it, his Ramadan dinner statement. Yet, he so ineptly defended what he apparently intended to be a straightforward endorsement of religious tolerance that pundits have begun to question whether he might have decided not to run for reelection in 2012 (http://tiny.cc/7q3vm ).
What can you say? The president’s delivered a performance of Bidenesque proportions.
Which made it all the more astonishing that Mr. Biden was the one with the turn of phrase that sent the mainstream media scurrying after it down the rabbit hole.
For the MSM is as much a fixture of the political class as Mr. Biden and Mr. Obama. So this week’s Sunday talk shows seemed at times to be a duel, which story would dominate, Mr. Obama’s mosque fiasco or Mr. Biden’s “Republican Tea Party” remark?
It is clear that the Democrats and their friends in the media feel that the Tea Party brand can be turned around to make the GOP seem unpalatably extreme to the Mainstream Public. It is as good a play as they may have at this stage of a game that is going badly against them. Former House GOP majority leader and Tea Party cheerleader Dick Armey gave them reason to hope on the weekend’s Meet the Press. When questioned about various proposals to reform Medicare, he didn’t seem to know that it and Social Security are already essentially bankrupt. To do nothing will be to destroy them. Reformers are the rescuers.
Still, the spontaneous Tea Party movement began over alarm about the extremism in spending, taxing, and assertions of arbitrary power by the Political Class. Poll after poll in the past year has shown that this alarm is shared throughout Mr. Rassmussen’s Mainstream Public.
The mainstream media may not get the Mainstream Public. Those who do get it and are capable of heeding its call for reforming, limiting, and returning to solvency the United States government will shape the nation’s politics in the decade to come.