-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Seizing the Moment – Or Not | HughHewitt.com | 05.23.10
The question around Washington this past week – in the air, even when it wasn’t on the lips – was, will the Republicans make the same mistake the British Conservative’s made? Will they fall short of the electoral triumph that appears to be waiting for them?
In a recent Wall Street Journal article (see: http://tiny.cc/pvdi9), Henry Olsen of the American Enterprise Institute argues that Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair offered a kind of Americanization of Britain, with policies that favored enterprise and mobility, saying to the British people, you are not subjects; you are citizens. The newly elected Prime Minister David Cameron, Olsen says, didn’t and still doesn’t understand this fact, which is why he won an only tentative victory, forcing him to agree on making Liberal Democratic Party leader, Nick Clegg, his deputy prime minister. In other words, the Conservative Party leadership does not understand its own country.
After Rand Paul’s meltdown over his views on the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (for pity’s sake), the question has arisen, have too many elements of the GOP failed to understand their country, or even their congressional districts and states?
For years, the GOP’s national leadership has been all but clueless about the disenchantment growing around the nation. But now, in talks with senior Republicans around town and beyond, I increasingly sense that the message of 2006 and 2008 is sinking in. Not with everyone, but among the more astute. They understand that the GOP Congresses of George W. Bush’s presidency and the President himself totally dropped the tax and spending ball, and this is why voters turned them out.
In many respects, those who switched from Bush in 2004 to the Democrats in 2006 and 2008 and are now returning to the Republicans share the concerns of Henry Olsen’s swing vote in Britain. They highly prize individual autonomy and enterprise. They are emphatically citizens, not subjects, and are showing themselves to be super sensitive to what they see as Obama Administration moves to subject them to the whims of an overreaching government. More broadly, they see astronomical increases in Federal spending (and the taxes that will inevitably go along) and vast expansions of Federal power as threats to the national character, in particular to democratic self-government and the freedom to chart one’s own course in life. Increasingly, as I say, the most astute leaders in Congress understand this.
But with Rand Paul’s meltdown, these same leaders are now wondering if the party’s new elements understand other parts of American life, those parts that in one way or another they will need to bring into any winning coalition. They look not just at Kentucky but at candidates in Colorado and Florida – states Republican Senate candidates should take handily in November. They worry that the autumn elections will not produce the victories needed to stop the Administration-backed legislation that voters like those who have shown up at Tea Party rallies have mobilized to halt and reverse.
At the same time, I have been hearing nearly opposite worries from party leaders outside of Washington. Not long ago, I attended a small dinner with a young statewide elected official. It was an off-the-record meeting, so I won’t identify the official beyond saying that this was the kind of person whom critics of Washington would admire. I expect to see this official move to Washington after the current job.
But this state office holder worried not that the party would do too poorly in November but too well. “We don’t have a program,” this officeholder said. “We are not ready to take over the government. We can’t afford to waste another time in control of Congress.”
It was Victor Hugo who so famously said that there is no power on earth equal to an idea whose time has come. In this Sunday’s New York Times, Thomas Friedman wrote (see: http://tiny.cc/8he7m) of the disappearing room for fiscal error in the United States today. There is much Friedman will never understand (he works for The New York Times after all), but if he has started to grasp this truth, the truth that drives the Tea Party crowd and the American swing vote, if even he understands it, we may be witnessing the arrival of an idea’s time.
Here’s the rub. These past few weeks, I have heard similar worries from GOP leaders inside and outside of Washington, from those who were concerned we wouldn’t do well enough in November and those worried we would do too well. They all come down to this: What if our time arrives and, for whatever reason, we aren’t ready?
The British Conservatives were not ready to seize a moment that was begging to be seized. American Republicans worry that they, too, could fall short in November.