-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
The Economics of 2008: A Choice of Middle Classes | HughHewitt.com | 10.27.08
When it comes to visions of the middle class, the 2008 presidential campaign is not between Barack Obama and John McCain so much as between Andy Stern and Joe the Plumber. What does that means for our country and its future?
Andy Stern is head of the Service Employees International Union. By Senator Obama’s standard of earning less than $250,000 a year, he is probably not middle class. Labor leaders at his level typically make much more. But he is a major spokesperson for a view of the American middle class that Senator Obama has embraced and promises to make an organizing principle of his administration.
This middle class is a sad crowd.
Its members have suffered years of declining earnings — or had in Senator Obama’s rhetoric until, apparently, someone noticed that they hadn’t, whereupon the rhetoric changed to one of stagnating earnings growth, a questionable but at least defensible proposition.
About a quarter of them lack health insurance – although the actual number of the uninsured falls to around six percent of the US population when you eliminate 1) those who are between jobs for only a few months and will have insurance once they get that new job, and 2) those who are in fact poor and eligible for Medicaid but haven’t applied, and 3) illegal aliens.
And the Stern-Obama middle class is seeing its jobs shipped overseas – although foreign investment in the US has long created substantially more jobs here than US investment abroad has created in the rest of the world.
But as Senator Obama describes it, this middle class is basically a dead-end gang. Its members are life’s passive players. They will never be any more prosperous than they are today and will probably soon be much less so.
This middle class needs Mr. Stern’s union and others like it to protect them – even if they keep rejecting unions in organizing elections. So Senator Obama has embraced card check, legislation effectively to eliminate the secret ballot in determining the unionization of America’s workplaces.
It also needs the kind of employer-mandated health coverage Senator Obama advocates. The government will charge a fine (or fee, or tax, whatever you call it) of employers who opt out of providing coverage and use the money to fund insurance for the company’s workers. Presumably this fee will be subsidized, if not immediately, then after Congress got through playing with it. Soon, and particularly in states where insurance is expensive (that is, states that have loaded mandates on policies sold in the state), the government-sponsored insurance policies will push out those that aren’t sold through the government. In other words, Senator Obama has put forward a two-step plan leading to single-payer health coverage. This is surely why single-payer-advocate Stern hasn’t objected to it.
The members of the Stern-Obama middle class don’t own stock. They do not intend to start or participate in the starting of businesses – and will not move up where they work today. This stagnation applies to their children as well. So of course Senator Obama’s call for letting the Bush tax cuts expire and piling additional taxes on $250,000-a-year earners will be OK by them.
In other words, Senator Obama’s middle class – borrowed from Mr. Stern — lives without hope, except the hope that Mr. Obama himself brings to them.
Senator McCain’s middle class is very different.
Like Joe the Plumber, many are employed in small businesses — or aspire to buy a business or start one of their own someday. In other words, one way or another they are working to move up in life. So, like Joe the Plumber, they are concerned about letting the 2003 tax cuts expire and about loading even more taxes on incomes they hope soon to have.
Active players in their own lives, they will switch jobs a number of times during their careers. So McCain’s proposal to allow them to own health insurance policies that they can carry wherever they go fits their needs – just as the Obama plan does not.
A remarkable number of small businesses sell and buy overseas – as do most larger companies — so Senator Obama’s embrace of protectionism is a threat to Senator McCain’s middle class, not an offer of help.
The point is that like Joe the Plumber these are people who make their own hope. Such people have characterized all the employment growth in the US economy for at least three decades. Today owners and employees of small businesses – or larger companies that were recently small — comprise by far the bulk of the US workforce.
Despite Senator McCain’s repeated resistance to Bush administration as well as Congressional run ups in spending these past eight years, Senator Obama will again charge this week (per Sunday night reports) that Senator McCain has never defined a single area in which he would act differently on the economy than has the President.
But setting aside the disingenuous rhetoric, here is this year’s real choice regarding the character of our economic future. On one side is Senator Obama’s passive and hopeless middle class, on the other Senator McCain’s active and aspiring one. Andy Stern v. Joe the Plumber: in a week and a day, we’ll see which vision the nation embraces.
Clark S. Judge is managing director of the White House Writers Group, Inc., a Washington-based policy and communications consulting firm. He was a special assistant and speechwriter to President Reagan.