-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Thursday v. Friday: Set Piece Battle v. War of Maneuver | HughHewitt.com | 09.01.08
Last week the nation witnessed two top-of-their-game presidential campaigns at work, campaigns as stunningly different as they were impressive — different in ways that told a great deal about each candidate.
On Thursday night the Obama campaign mounted a show unlike any ever seen in a presidential election: a massive stadium filled to the top rows, a stage inside the stadium shooting off fireworks reminiscent of those at the Beijing Olympics’ Bird’s Nest, rock star entertainment, and at the climax, an elegantly delivered acceptance speech marking a moment of true historic importance.
The extravaganza was entirely emblematic of the Obama campaign: painstakingly planned, flawless executed. If, other than metaphorically, politics were war, the Obama operation would be a worthy successor to the tank battalions in which the candidate’s grandfather served during the Second World War. It is a master of set-piece battles.
Over the past two years it has constructed the most productive fundraising machine in the history of American politics, assembled what is reputed to be an equally unparalleled ground organization and stage uncountable numbers of flawless events at which the candidate always delivers an inspirational speech. It has rolled relentlessly across the fields of political engagement, sweeping even the formidable Clinton operation before it. It may not show or need much imagination, but it has proven amazingly effective.
Friday was McCain’s day and a totally different story. The McCain campaign is anything but a juggernaut. Its strength is in maneuver. Again and again over recent months it has shown the capacity to surprise, redefining the election in small ways and large, not once, but many times. From the celebrity spot to the challenge for weekly debates to the vice presidential pick announced on Friday, it has repeatedly stunned the pundits and the opposition.
Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was a brilliant choice for VP on multiple levels. Yes, she has energized the base. One conservative blogger reports stunning enthusiasm in emails to him from conservatives who had been sitting on their hands. At the same time she appears to be appealing to independents, particularly to suburban women. Selecting Palin may prove a key move for capturing Colorado, Nevada and even, some have suggested, Pennsylvania.
But as GOP leaders have been telling every cable news show that would listen, she also helps McCain refurbish his standing as a maverick reformer. On the state level she has been everything John McCain has been on the federal level and then some – opposing sweetheart deal spending, showing no tolerance for corruption of any kind. Putting McCain and Palin together promises to deliver not so much a GOP as an SOB ticket – tough, gruff and spoiling to take on both sides of the aisle.
And it must be said, by every appearance, the driver behind all these clever moves and innovative strategies appears to have been McCain himself. Twice now he has shaken up his campaign team, removing or reassigning aides, looking for talent to fit the tasks of the moment – and each time he appears to have got the results he wanted.
In contrast, Obama’s campaign staff has been stable, even during rough patches — so stable as to raise a question: did Obama create it, or did it, in some way we haven’t yet grasped, create Obama. In other words, is it the candidate’s political machine or someone else’s, with the candidate serving as its face and voice?
By Sunday night, one poll (CNN’s) was showing the race all but tied again, as it had been at the start of the Democratic convention. With the near cancellation of the start of the GOP proceedings, McCain has produced another surprise.
But will it be enough to overcome the enormous advantage of resources on the Democratic side, in a year that the public mood is universally thought to favor the out party? If McCain is to beat Obama, he’ll have to produce many more surprises. But with his VP choice and changing his convention, he produced two in three days.
Hold on. It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
Clark S. Judge is managing director of the White House Writers Group, Inc.