-
Recent Posts
- Kamala’s brother-in-law fleeced taxpayers for billions to give to left-wing groups and lawyers | New York Post | 8.24. 24
- Coming: Global Political Recalibration
- Clark Judge: FDR, Reagan, and European Nationalism | NatCon Rome 2020
- Lady Gaga Tells All
- Trial Lawyers Use COVID-19 to Prey on America’s Corporations | Real Clear Policy | 12.1.20
Categories
- Book Reviews (12)
- Communication Strategy (23)
- Constitution and Law (14)
- Economic Policy: General (33)
- Economic Policy: Health Care (30)
- Economic Policy: The Great Financial Crisis (15)
- Economic Policy: US Debt Crisis (32)
- Education Policy (1)
- Global Issues (57)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2008 (18)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2012 (43)
- Political Commentary: Campaign 2020 (5)
- Political Commentary: General (122)
- Politics & Policy (6)
- Ronald Reagan and the Reagan Administration (11)
- Speeches/Lectures (9)
- Uncategorized (6)
Archives
- September 2024
- March 2023
- July 2022
- April 2022
- December 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- November 2019
- December 2018
- September 2017
- April 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- January 2008
- June 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- June 2006
- October 2005
- August 2005
- March 2005
- November 2004
- August 2004
- June 2004
- December 2003
- October 2003
- August 2003
- April 2003
- July 2002
- December 2001
- November 2001
- May 2001
- December 2000
- June 2000
- January 1995
- August 1994
- August 1992
- June 1991
- July 1990
- September 1989
- July 1989
- March 1989
Tags
2012 2012 election Benghazi campaign constitution debt debt crisis Democrats economy election 2012 Energy Financial Times fiscal cliff foreign policy Gingrich Global Warming GOP Hoover Digest hughhewitt HughHewitt.com Immigration IRS National Review New York Post New York Times Obama Obamacare Republicans Ricochet Ricochet.com Romney Russia Scandal Senate SOTU speech Supreme Court Syria Tea Party Trump U.S. News Ukraine Wall Street Journal war Washington Times
Let the Contest Begin | HughHewitt.com | 08.18.08
By Monday next week, all eyes will be turned to Denver and the Russian roulette convention that the Clintons have now forced on Team Obama. The GOP presidential nominating meeting starts the following Monday. So this is the last week of the long primary and post-primary season before the traditional campaign begins. How does the race for the White House look today?
Going into this past weekend, the candidates were effectively tied. Whether you rely on the Real Clear Politics average of polls or the Rasmussen or Gallup daily trackings, what only a couple of months ago looked like an Obama walk-away is now a margin-of-error match-up.
How the candidates come out of this weekend is another matter. The nationally televised Showdown at Saddleback — one of the most intelligent and civilized presidential candidate events ever staged (ever, as in as far back as 1788) – turned out to be an almost no-contest McCain win. The Arizona senator came off as direct and detailed in his answers, confident and commanding in his presence and in sync with his audience. In contrast, though ever the elegant presenter, Barak Obama seemed to slip from his famous eloquence into what sounded more like a loquacious evasiveness. The worst moment came when he sidestepped the question of when life begins – a question at the heart of the life v. abortion debate – saying it was above his pay grade. He is running for president of the United States. There is no higher pay grade.
As we all know, McCain faces two big political tasks – energizing skeptical GOP voters while winning over Independents. The mainstream media has portrayed this as a combining of incompatibles. Saturday’s forum showed why it might not prove such a conundrum. In forcefully championing lower taxes, less federal spending, global trade, life and an unapologetic enthusiasm for America as humanity’s last best hope, he reminded former GOP voters and current lukewarm supporters of why they have so often backed the Republican project. For a faltering economy that is and can only be driven by entrepreneurship and global trade and for a world facing threats ranging from al Qaeda terrorism to Russian troop movements, he came off as the right candidate for the present danger.
But whether or not the polls open up in McCain’s favor this coming week, Obama has three big moves yet to make on the political chessboard.
The first is his pick of a running mate. Last week, I suggested former Michigan governor John Engler as a match for McCain. This sparked a vigorous online debate, much of it regarding former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney. To me, both Romney and Engler would help McCain achieve what I see as essential strategic goals – flip Michigan to the GOP column, give the ticket an experienced voice on economic issues, and energize voters who are truly concerned about the family values agenda.
Obama’s V.P. choice could move the race even more. For example, imagine if the Illinois senator were to pick as his running mate Florida senator Bill Nelson. How can GOP win this year without Florida, which polls show tied? With Nelson on the ticket, Republicans would have to throw huge dollars into holding the must-win state. The point here is that Obama’s choice could have more impact on this close campaign than anyone has yet imagined. A running mate from Virginia, Ohio, New Mexico or any of several other states could change the contest’s dynamics.
Obama’s second big potential chess move is ethnicity – race. Ethnicity is almost certainly a net plus for his candidacy. It insures record turnout in the nation’s most heavily Democratic minority group. It also pulls to Obama upscale suburban independents who see him as a vehicle for putting racial divisions permanently behind the country. If on economics and national security grounds that groups starts to stray, subtle reminders of this aspiration can pull them back.
Finally, Obama has money – far, far more than McCain will have. And he hasn’t even begun to unleash it. The real spending will probably start right after Labor Day. And the McCain campaign will need to show even more cleverness than they have to date to make up for the gap in dollars.
So as the campaign stands today, McCain has scored big points on issues. But Obama holds in reserve big resources, including big money, that McCain can’t match. In a year that should favor the Democrats hands down, the polls have the contest tied. Let the contest begin.